P.-J. Proudhon, “Bank of Exchange”
[Preface, by Darimon] QU’EST-CE QUE LA PROPRIÉTÉ? 25 avril 1848. Le 25 février, les ouvriers sont allés à l’Hôtel-de-Ville, et ils ont dit à M. de Lamartine : Que devons-nous crier? Criez : Vive la […]
[Preface, by Darimon] QU’EST-CE QUE LA PROPRIÉTÉ? 25 avril 1848. Le 25 février, les ouvriers sont allés à l’Hôtel-de-Ville, et ils ont dit à M. de Lamartine : Que devons-nous crier? Criez : Vive la […]
DOUZIÈME ÉTUDE DE LA SANCTION MORALE FRAGMENTS ESSAIS D’UNE PHILOSOPHIE POPULAIRE. — N° 12. DE LA JUSTICE DANS LA RÉVOLUTION ET DANS L’ÉGLISE. DOUZIÈME ÉTUDE. DE LA SANCTION MORALE. FRAGMENTS. Monseigneur, Me voici parvenu […]
Proudhon’s first major work, The Celebration of Sunday, was subject to quite a number of revisions between the first edition in 1839 and what appears to be the fourth edition in 1850. The Preface and notes seem to have been particularly subject to change. As I have been revising my translation of the text from the 19th-century Œuvres Complètes, I wanted to determine the extent of the changes and turned to the notes published in the 20th-century Rivière edition, including the “Appendix” that I recently translated, which includes some material from a manuscript, perhaps now no longer accessible, that did not appear in any of the editions. That material revealed that at the time of the Rivière edition it was believed that Proudhon’s original 1839 edition was lost, one of the factors prompted the scholarly exchange around the manuscripts. Having access, at present to the 1838 volume, but not the manuscript, I can’t say any more about the sections addressed to the Academy, but I can say that the story of the revisions was a bit more complicated and different in its details than was suggested in that 20th-century exchange. As part of the work of clarifying the details, in preparation for a new Corvus Editions New Proudhon Library release, I’ve translated the first three versions of the Preface. […]
DE LA CÉLÉBRATION DU DIMANCHE PAGES RETROUVÉES Nous n’avions pas manqué, quand nous avons eu à préparer la réédition des premières œuvres de Proudhon, de rechercher s’il était encore possible de lire les manuscrits, les […]
NEUVIÈME ÉTUDE PROGRÈS ET DÉCADENCE À Son Éminence Mgr Matthieu, Cardinal-Archevêque de Besançon. I ESSAIS D’UNE PHILOSOPHIE POPULAIRE. — N° 9. DE LA JUSTICE DANS LA RÉVOLUTION ET DANS L’ÉGLISE. NEUVIÈME ÉTUDE. PROGRÈS ET DÉCADENCE. […]
A libertarian, from whatever discipline he claims to be, defines himself as essentially individualist and non-conformist. The libertarian spirit, according to the views that I propose to lay out, manifests itself in a constant desire for clarity, realism, objectivity. However, the initial structure of human societies was, as we know, strictly communitarian. One cannot, consequently, study the behaviors that are appropriate to a libertarian spirit, without having previously situated the individual with the group. […]
[These draft translations are part of on ongoing effort to translate both editions of Proudhon’s Justice in the Revolution and in the Church into English, together with some related works, as the first step toward […]
HUITIÈME ÉTUDE CONSCIENCE ET LIBERTÉ CHAPITRE PREMIER. Objections théologiques : Qu’il s’agit moins de donner les formules de la Justice que d’en procurer l’observance, laquelle ne peut se passer de religion. I ESSAIS D’UNE PHILOSOPHIE […]
One key challenge for modern readers of Proudhon’s Justice is that the sections where he presumably provides his mature “solution of the social problem,” his account of basic social relations organized according to principles of immanent justice, are also the sections where his anti-feminism poses the most significant challenges for us. The account itself is hardly a mystery. I translated the “Catechism of Marriage” late in that 2014 campaign. Proudhon’s appropriation of the androgyne theory that had been popular in Saint-Simonian circles is straightforward enough — and, I think, there are also very few obstacles to making of it something useful, which dispenses with the particular forms of biological essentialism that we cite among the sources of the problem in Proudhon’s work. What does seem to remain a bit mysterious is a fairly wide range of details, through which Proudhon moved from some biological notions of dubious validity to a theory of social organization that is in some ways tantalizingly close to what we might hope for from an anarchist social science. […]
Written sometime around 1858, since Proudhon cites the recent publication of 1848 : Historical revelations: inscribed to Lord Normanby, which appeared in that year, “Qu’est-ce que enfin que la République?” seems to have remained an […]
Copyright © 2025 | MH Magazine WordPress Theme by MH Themes